The tool is visually appealing and has features like assignees, milestones, and labels, to mention a few. You can see what each developer is working on if you are the team lead. Such team members can also create issues and label them accordingly. One of the key characteristics of GitLab is that it is written in the Ruby programming language. It offers an open-core development model and it’s an open source solution as well.
Feature Breakdown
So, let’s compare GitLab and GitHub, looking at what they each offer, how they work, their best features, and what they’re best used for. GitLab came later; Ukrainian developers Dmitriy Zaporozhets and Valery Sizov created GitLab in 2011. From day one, GitLab was designed to be a set of collaboration tools as well as a code repository service. Still, fundamentally, both offer web-based repositories with open-source, Git-based code management and local file changes with a remote repository. So, if all you want is basic Git functionality but with someone else to worry over keeping Git up and running, either service will do well for you.
GitLab vs GitHub: Key Differences
When done, they will push the code to their respective repositories, compare the changes, and merge if all conditions are met. GitHub allows developers to track the code changes, collaborate and manage pull requests. If you have a distributed team working on a big project, the team lead can create a repository and give access to different members. If need be, the members can create different branches and fork the source code to their local machines. GitLab offers a built-in CI/CD system, more control, and self-hosting.
Differences between GitHub and GitLab
In GitLab, milestones are a way to keep track of problems and merge requests that have been generated to accomplish a larger target in a certain amount of time. We can create and monitor milestones at the project at any stage, as well as display all problems for the milestone you’re working on, which represents an Agile program increment or release. For example, the ability to automatically launch Cloud resources in response to code changes can provide significant value to organizations. GitLab includes SSO integration but GitHub requires an Enterprise organization (GitHub’s term for the highest paid tier of service).
Managers can grant confidential access only to project participants from a certain role. Inner sourcing allows teams to use open-sourcing within their organization, allowing everyone in the organization the ability to see and potentially modify internal projects according to their roles. GitLab facilitates this type of functionality, but GitHub does not. Now, you have an idea of what Git is and how it can be hosted in both GitLab and GitHub. But to truly understand how these platforms work for DevOps and other workflows, you’ll need to understand the difference between GitHub and GitLab.
Bonus tip: Get user feedback & bug reports with Usersnap
It allows them to view and work on branches created by other people and also to review change requests such as pull requests or merge requests. These requests are used to add code https://traderoom.info/gitlab-vs-github/ from one branch to another, like from a development branch to a production branch. Before we jump into the cloud platforms, let’s take a moment to cover Git for those unfamiliar.
Next, we are going to focus on the differences between the two platforms. With social networking-like features, GitHub enables users to access features such as feeds, followers, wikis, and more. GitHub is mainly used for code due to its built-in tools to review and improve it. Git, with its distributed version control system nature, tracks changes in source code during the SDLC. Created in 2005 by Linus Torvalds (creator of Linux) and originally designed as a low-level version control system engine, Git is now a full-fledged repository that is mature, open source, and free. From the standpoint of community and support, too, GitLab and GitHub are similar.
However, even the most advanced workflows are highly inefficient if they rely on multiple separate coding tools to conduct the entire complex life cycle of development. With GitLab, you can provide access to the issue tracker (for example) without giving permission to the source code. This is obviously great for larger teams and enterprises with role-based contributors. With over 100,000 organizations and users leveraging GitLab, it became the 4th fastest growing private software company in 2018. GitLab’s popularity is due partly to its seamless integration with Continuous Integration technologies.
- It also works better than its predecessors, such as Apache Subversion, Concurrent Versions System (CVS), Perforce, and Rational ClearCase.
- Bitbucket and GitHub are popular web-based hosting services for version control repositories.
- In terms of raw speed and response time, GitHub is faster, but in areas like CI/CD and advanced monitoring and analytics tools, GitLab is way ahead.
- A commit can include a change to a single file or multiple files.
- They also both offer features designed to provide CI/CD, project management, and security functionality, although GitLab’s product suite is broader and deeper in this respect.
While Git is a constant between the two platforms, there are some notable differences in how each platform recommends you use Git to manage your software projects. Both platforms have their own “Flow” for how they recommend users merge changes into production. However, you may not need to integrate with third-party tools as GitLab has CI/CD feature built-in. However, the integrations provided by GitLab are less than those on GitHub. Each member will work on different files independently on their local machines. Such members will use Git to track changes to the code on their machines.
Real-life projects require version control systems as they typically have several programmers working at once on a software project. Thus, a version control system, such as Git, ensures there are no code overlaps or conflicts. Regardless of the platform you choose, adopting a version https://traderoom.info/ control system like GitHub or GitLab is essential for efficient and successful software development. So, evaluate your needs, explore the features, and make an informed decision to boost your development process. From a security perspective, too, GitLab and GitHub are quite similar.
Everhour is a timekeeping tool that will function seamlessly as a GitLab time tracking integration or as one for GitHub. You can set up your GitLab time tracking or GitHub time tracking easily and swiftly. Both platforms provide features that allow teams to monitor the status of problems, assignees for each task, and goals that the team may have for a certain time period. Managers can also easily search through this information through the various filter and sorting features that these views have.